|
|
Komentar ot: freeman |
Data: 17-12-2003 |
[ Drugi komentari] |
First Draft to Second Draft
* The idea of voting bodies was removed. It was creating too much complexity in infrastructure to retain the amount of control that Red Hat requires for its participation in the project, for no real gain. It was also contrary to existing practice, both in Linux and Red Hat's experience building a distribution. In practice, both have been based on rough consensus and working code, with a benevolent hierarchical dictatorship. We will stick to working practice.
Purviiat draft e pisan sushtite tezi hora koito sa pisali i vtoriia. Taka, che tova sa pak hora ot Red Hat. Tova ne e krainata tsel na zaniatieto, no beshe reklamirano i vposledstvie premahnato shtoto kakto kaza g-n Radnev:
"V interes na istinata niakude na tozi sait sum pisal za RH i za Fedora, samo che togava misleh (shtoto taka se reklamirashe), che shte bude Debian-like, ama nutski, niama da bude Debian-like, shte bude Company-like podhod. Nie shte rukovodim i opredeliame, vie shte rabotite. E, sori ama, trudno shte namerite balutsi.
Problemut, koito vizhdam az, e tvurde mnogoto reklama. I kakto vizhdash, reklamata e dala razultat. Vsichki, deto sa se izkazali misliat, che Fedora e Debian-like, ama istinata e, che ne e."
Taka, che ne vizhdam zashto se zasiagash.
|
<< Kum: Kum: Kum: Ti shta ma proshtavash, ama | Policy >> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|