Само се надявам СКОРО да се предизвика известна реакция, защото като гледам по темата няма много коментари.
Писах на нашите европредставители и
г-жа Антония Първанова ми отговори следното:
Цитат |
NApalno vi podkrepyam za iniciativata. Snosti v zala izteche debata po Zingaretti doklada, t.e. IPRED2. Glasuvaneto ste bade utre, sryada. Dovechera ima zasedanie na parlamentarnata ni grupa ALDE i po moe predlozenie ste ima diskusia po temata za da vzemem obsta pozicia po glasuvaneto. Ste vi izpratya i stanovisteto na dokladchika.
SPESHNO, imam nuzda ot konsultacia s vas!!! Molya naj-kompetentnia ot vas speshno da mi zvanne na tel: XXXXXXXXXXXXX Ne sam kompetentna po temata i mi tryabvat tochni argumenti za dovechera
|
Ето и въпросния доклад:
Цитат |
Nicola Zingaretti
Socialist Group
For the Attention of
Members of the European Parliament
Strasbourg, 23rd of April 2007
Subject: Your support to criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
Dear Colleague,
we are finally approaching the last chapter of this important directive. Somebody expressed her/his concern regarding the text and the whole proposal, but nevertheless the technicality of the theme requires the proper knowledge and confidence of the topic that not all among us have.
I therefore think that it might be useful to clarify some of the most relevant points of this dossier:
1. This is a legislative text aiming at tackling organized crime and the harms produced to European countries due to counterfeiting and infringements of intellectual property rights.
Organized crime is nowadays a global activity that does not recognize borders nor customs and that can count on extremely strong economic resources.
It causes a fatal harm to European industries, since it deeply damages the most elementary rules of markets and competition.
It causes a fatal harm to European workers, because workers employed in criminal activities do not have any kind to protection, security and guarantee given to the regular workers; nevertheless, figures show that during the last ten years more than 125.000 European regular workers lost their job due to the unfair competition perpetrated by counterfeiters worldwide.
It causes a fatal harm to European consumers, whose rights and guarantees are not respected properly when it comes to the quality of goods bought. It is useless to draft regulations and legislations in favour of consumers' rights if the EU does not have appropriate instruments to fight against dangerous goods.
It causes a particular harm to patients worldwide, since the flows of counterfeited medicines is constantly increasing. Furthermore, most of these flows pass through European seaports in order to reach poor countries worldwide. The Executive Secretary of the World Health Organization Taskforce, Mr Valerio Reggi, has recently stated that "this legislation, if approved, will provide a great help for the work of this taskforce".
2. This report fixes clear borders between what is liable of criminal sanctions and what is not.
Only infringements committed "on a commercial scale" are liable of criminal sanctions. But the current legislation mentioning the definition of "commercial scale" (art. 61 TRIPS) do not state the explicit exclusion of private users from the sanctions. Now, thanks to amendment 39, all acts committed by "final users for personal and not for profits purposes" would be excluded from the scope of this directive.
3. This report excludes patents' rights and patents' related rights from the scope of the directive.
Patents, utility models, plant variety rights and supplementary protection certificates are not covered by this report. Given the specific disputes on patents rights and patents' infringements, the report states that these rights have to be protected only through measures of civil law.
Please do not hesitate to contact us for further informations.
With my best regads,
Nicola Zingaretti.
Rapporteur
|
Не твърдя, че от това изобщо ще излезе нещо, но все пак всеки аргумент би бил от полза.