Ura
Ot: Stanislav Georgiev <s_georgiev< at >abv__dot__bg>
Na: 2-05-2006@12:49 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenZa tezi, koito ne iskat da instalirat po mrezhata, ili da zarezhdat ot disketa - mozhete da si napravite lesno sami ISO.
Iztegliate vsichki failove, kopirate si ISO-to za mrezhova instalatsiia i s podhodiashta programa (ili direktno montirane pod niakoia Unix OS) postaviate failovete - chast ot tiah v osnovnata direktoriia na ISO-to (bsd, bsd.mp, bsd.rd, fs failovete i eventualno ports, source), v direktoriia 3.9/i386 postaviate pak kurnulite i vsichki tgz failove - osnovnite paketi. I tova e vsichko.
Do den-dva shte se poiaviat i neofitsialni ISO-ta v Internet.
Razbira se, mozhete prosto da zapishete na tvurd disk, CD ili drug nositel i da zaredite ot disketa ili ISO-to za mrezhova instalatsiia ili CD instalatsiia - nai-dobre na CD RW (po razbiraemi prichini).
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Nazdrave!!!
Ot: Stefan
Na: 2-05-2006@22:43 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenTova e strahotna novina i triabva da se polee, tui kato OpenBSD se vodi za edna ot nai-stabilnite Unix sistemi. Povecheto Linux distributsii sa konfigurirani dosta zle po podrazbirane (demoni sus startiran root potrebitel, bez chroot, mnogo nenuzhni uslugi pusnati po podrazbirane, losha sistema za initsializirane, i oshte hiliadi takiva primeri). Pri OpenBSD sigurnostta e na purvo miasto. Da ne govorim che vsichko e otlichno strukturirano i e na litse klasikata i moshtta na Unix sistemite Packet Filter. Koito ne go e probval neka se ubedi lichno!!!
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Kum: Nazdrave!!!
Ot: borj
Na: 3-05-2006@8:07 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenStiga be trolove :) Ti Stefane koga posledno si vizhdal Linuks distributsiia? A sistemata za initsializirane - mnogo ... nepodgotveno se izkazvash, ama mnogo. NetBSD trugnaha (i pochti iztsialo go napraviha) da polzvat System V initsializatsiia, koiato pri Linuks polzvat vsichki distributsii s izklyuchenie na Slak i derivati. Vuzdurzhaite se ot takiva izhvurlianiia, molia vi. Smeshno e.
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Kum: Nazdrave!!!
Ot: Boris 'borj' Iordanov <boris__dot__jordanov< at >gmail__dot__com>
Na: 3-05-2006@8:48 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenStiga be trolove :) Ti Stefane koga posledno si vizhdal Linuks distributsiia? A sistemata za initsializirane - mnogo ... nepodgotveno se izkazvash, ama mnogo. NetBSD trugnaha (i pochti iztsialo go napraviha) da polzvat System V initsializatsiia, koiato pri Linuks polzvat vsichki distributsii s izklyuchenie na Slak i derivati. Vuzdurzhaite se ot takiva izhvurlianiia, molia vi. Smeshno e.
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Kum: Kum: Nazdrave!!!
Ot: Stanislav Georgiev <s_georgiev (a) abv __tochka__ bg>
Na: 4-05-2006@13:39 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenA spored teb Slackware Linux niama li runlevel niva?! Da ne bi da e kato *BSD?
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Kum: Kum: Kum: Nazdrave!!!
Ot: borj
Na: 5-05-2006@7:11 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenSpomenaval li sum neshto za niva? I ot kude ideiata, che *BSD niamat niva? Haide da sravnim /etc/inittab s /etc/ttys.
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Kum: Nazdrave!!!
Ot: Grigor Lekarov <hammerfall__at__bitex< dot >bg>
Na: 3-05-2006@11:37 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenSHTe go poleem Stefane kato se pribera v BG, no da znaesh, che birata e ot teb ;)
A tova koe e po-dobro shte komentirame na po bira. Ne mislia, che triabva da zanimavame foruma s tova. Veche linuks ne e kato predi i niakoi distributsii sa izchisteni ot nenuzhni demoni po podrazbirane, a i ne zabraviai, che Linuks ima dosta po goliama poddruzhka na draiveri. Neka novinata da ne vkarva v spor koia OS e po-dobra. I bez tova mi e omruznalo da cheta sporove koe Linuks distro e po-dobro. Vseki raboti s tova, koeto mu e prisurtse.
Haide niama da se vpuskam v poveche podrobnosti s prikazki za po bira. Ostaviam razgovora za togava.
Nazdrave!!!
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
kolko si zaet
Ot: daf
Na: 3-05-2006@14:32 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenIzviniavam se za vuprosa, no mislish li, che niakoi v tozi
sait se interesuva kolko si zaet i che niamash vreme?
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Kum: Nazdrave
Ot: kamen <kamen __@__ ggbit< dot >info>
Na: 4-05-2006@17:48 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenCHestita ni nova versiia!!! Polzvam obsd ot 3 mesetsa i sum udiven ot tova kolko e po-napred v mnogo otnosheniia ot raznite linuksi!!! Dano i za v budeshte ostanat tolkova stabilni i da ni radvat!!!
Ako niakoi ima problemi sus suzdavaneto na instal. disk, iz svobodnite torenti veche ima gotovi:
http://ts.searching.com/torrent/723641/...
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Znaete li tezi fakti...?
Ot: OpenFreak
Na: 4-05-2006@17:20 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/Neutralen"OpenBSD is secure because
1) The OpenBSD team created an extension to C (strlcpy and strlcat) that helped developers do safe text manipulation in C. They then audited a huge amount of user-space code to use these functions to replace strcpy() and strcat()
2) With regard to memory usage:
i) OpenBSD randomises the stack so that buffer overflow attacks can't execute malicious code (buffer overflow attacks work on the assumption that the stack will be in a certain state).
ii) OpenBSD uses a special version of malloc() to randomise allocations
3) OpenBSD supports the "no-execute bit", even in software, so that code in an application's data-segment cannot be executed (another componenent of buffer overflow attacks)
4) The OpenBSD team manually audits every program in the core distribution to ensure it is correct. They are still using gcc 2.95 in part because they can be certain it is bug-free.
In short, OpenBSD's success is due to building security concepts into the operating system, and auditing all the software that they provide.
"
Mezhdu drugoto ,mnogo sum dovolen ot OupenBSD-to, osobenno ot razbiraemiiat PF
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Kum: Kum: Kum: Nazdrave!!!
Ot: borj
Na: 5-05-2006@7:18 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenNo vse pak si prav, che sum v greshka. Pisah po tova koeto pomnia i iavno neshtata sa se promenili :)
"Slackware Linux uses the BSD-style file layout for its system initialization files. These files are organized and easy to edit. All of the system initialization files are stored in the /etc/rc.d directory. "
"Since version 7.0, Slackware includes System V init compatibility. Many other Linux distributions make use of this style instead of the BSD style. Basically each runlevel is given a subdirectory for init scripts, whereas BSD style gives one init script to each runlevel.
The rc.sysvinit script will search for any System V init scripts you have in /etc/rc.d and run them, if the runlevel is appropriate. This is useful for certain commercial software packages that install System V init scripts and scripts for BSD style init."
http://www.slackware.com/config/init.php
Kakvo izliza - i Slak e trugnal kum System V.
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Kum: Kum: Kum: Kum: Nazdrave!!!
Ot: Stanislav Georgiev <s_georgiev (a) abv __tochka__ bg>
Na: 9-05-2006@11:45 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/NeutralenQsno e, che Slackware izpolzvat System V initsializatsiia, kakto si napisal.
Sushto taka, iasno e, che Slackware e Linuks s pretentsii da bude "nai-blizkiia do BSD". Makar che ako gledame Crux i niakoi drugi distributsii, mai ne e suvsem taka.
TSelta ne mi e da sporia, a prosto da se iziasni istinata. Purviiat Linuks koito sum polzval, s izklyuchenie na niakakvi mini distributsii, koito se puskaha s loadlinx oshte prez 1994-5 beshe Slackware. Moga da kazha, che go poznavam dostatuchno.
Osnovnata razlika mezhdu System V i BSD baziranite Unix-i oshte ot edno vreme e imenno v run level-ite. BSD realno imat samo single user i multi user rezhim. Ne se prevklyuchvat razni mezhdinni rezhimi, ili kakto 3/5 v System 5. Otdelno sa startirashtite skriptove. Realno nishto ne prechi na niakoi da hvane koito si iska Unix i da promeni skriptovete, stiga da uspee da gi dokara v raboteshto sustoianie.
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Eto i ISO-to na OpenBSD 3.9
Ot: priqtel
Na: 5-05-2006@11:41 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/Neutralenhttp://store2.data.bg/osogovetz/os/Open...
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]
Kum: Eto i ISO-to na OpenBSD 3.9
Ot: kamen
Na: 5-05-2006@14:24 GMT+2
Otsenka: 1/Neutralenwow kakuv e toia disk 580 MB ?!?!? Dopulnitelen soft li ima ili prosto sa vklyucheni i drugi arhitekturi?
[Otgovori na tozi komentar]